Question
- Does the diagram in Munkres 22.2 commute?
Overview
The word “quotient” refers to dividing a space into disjoint pieces. One way to formalize this idea is by constructing quotient spaces: given an equivalence relation on a topological space , the set of equivalence classes
can be thought as what’s left after “crushing” all points that are similar to each other down to a single element. The quotient topology is the topology that makes the canonical projection, or quotient map defined by continuous.
Quotient are generally thought of in terms of their universal property: if is a function that is constant on equivalence classes, then is still well-defined after “crushing” the equivalence class to a single point. In fact, the universal property implies that the quotient topology is chosen precisely so that such a map is still continuous.
Notation
Given , let be the equivalence relation given by or for all . Then we write for the quotient where all of is “crushed” to a point.
Related: Disjoint unions
Quotient spaces
Definition: Quotient topology
Let be an equivalence relation on a topological space , and let
be an equivalence class. The set of equivalence classes
where if and only if , has a canonical projection or quotient map sending point to its equivalence class ; the notation indicates an element of , rather than a subset
The quotient topology on is the topology such that is continuous:
Link to originalTheorem: Universal property of quotient spaces
If is a topological space and is an equivalence relation on , the projection map is continuous.
Moreover, if is a continuous map that is constant on equivalence classes, meaning that if , then , then induces a continuous map defined by
and . We say that “factors through” the quotient .
#wip “Gluing”
Quotient maps
Definition: Quotient map, relative quotient topology
A continuous function is a quotient map if is surjective and
The quotient topology on (relative to ) is the unique topology such that is a quotient map.
Lemma:
Let be continuous and surjective. Then is a quotient map if either of the following hold:
Theorem (Munkres 22.2): Characterizing continuous functions out of quotient spaces
Let be a quotient map. Let be a space and let be a function which is constant on for all . Then there exists a unique such that .
Moreover:
- (i) The universal property of quotients. is continuous if and only if is continuous;
- (ii) is a quotient map if and only if is a quotient map.
#concept-question Does this diagram commute?
Theorem: The relationship between quotient maps and quotient spaces
Let be a quotient map. Define and equivalence relation on by setting
Then there exists a homeomorphism , and the diagram
commutes. That is, every quotient map is of the form .
Examples
Interval with endpoints glued together
Consider the interval with the equivalence relation if either: ; and ; or and . This is the simplest equivalence relation under which . Note the following:
- There are two types of points in : if , then the point corresponds to the equivalence class . If , then the point corresponds to the equivalence class .
- Every open interval is saturated, meaning it is a union of equivalence classes for all , which project to (i.e., their images under are) open sets in the quotient.
- The half-open interval for does not project to an open set . (❓ why would if saturated?).
TBD
, .
Making the torus from , define by and for all .
- Take the minimal equivalence relation generated by these conditions (a relation) — taking the intersection of all relations .
- Technically , , have declared symmetry and transitivity by doing so? (the four points in the corners are equivalent)
- ❓ so classes are explicitly what?
Quotients with and
- .
Review
- 🔺 Show that if is open, then is an open subset of which is a union of equivalence classes (i.e., saturated); and that if is saturated, then is open (note that .
- 🔺 Check that the quotient topology is indeed a topology.
Proof appendix
Link to originalLemma:
Let be continuous and surjective. Then is a quotient map if either of the following hold:
Proof from Topology.
- (i) Suppose is open. If is an open map, then is an open set, and this is equivalent to by surjectivity. If is a closed map, is closed, implying is open.
- (ii) If is a closed set, then is also compact. Since is continuous, is also compact, means closed subset of Hausdorff space. Then is a closed map and we are back in (i).#wip
Link to originalTheorem (Munkres 22.2): Characterizing continuous functions out of quotient spaces
Let be a quotient map. Let be a space and let be a function which is constant on for all . Then there exists a unique such that .
Moreover:
- (i) The universal property of quotients. is continuous if and only if is continuous;
- (ii) is a quotient map if and only if is a quotient map.
Proof from Topology.
- Existence of . Let . Since is surjective, we may pick such that , and set . The condition on guarantees is well-defined ❓, uniqueness is clear.
- (i) continuous continuous. Let be open. Then is open in . Since is a quotient map, this implies is open.
- (i) continuous continuous.
- 🔺 Exercise: check composition of quotient maps is a quotient map.
Proof of (ii) from MME Topology notes.
We restate (ii) as the following:
Proposition: Surjections from compact spaces to Hausdorff spaces are quotients
Let be a continuous surjection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space. Then if is the equivalence relation
then the induced map is a homeomorphism; equivalently, is a quotient map.
Link to originalTheorem: The relationship between quotient maps and quotient spaces
Let be a quotient map. Define and equivalence relation on by setting
Then there exists a homeomorphism , and the diagram
commutes. That is, every quotient map is of the form .