Overview
Extension of notes on Homology of general chain complexes. Informally, relative homology of a subspace counts the number of “holes” in that are not in . In particular, if the inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, then the spaces are the same from the perspective of homology, and thus the relative homology groups are all zero.
Relevant theorems:
- (Theorem) (Relative) homology is homotopy invariant
- (Theorem) The relative homology of a subset is isomorphic to the subset with excision when the closure of the excision is in the interior of the subset
Basic definition
Relative homology
Let be a pair of spaces where as a (topological) subspace. If is another pair of spaces, a map of pairs is a continuous such that .
To obtain a chain complex from a pair of spaces, let be the quotient group consisting of formal linear combinations of -simplices, and let be defined by the commutative diagram
where is the map induced by inclusion and is the quotient map. The relative homology of is defined as the homology of the chain complex :
The long exact sequence in relative homology
Notice that
is a short exact sequence for all , which incudes a long exact sequence of homology groups
where is the connecting homomorphism defined explicitly as follows: let be a relative homology class represented by with . Then is the homology class in defined by the boundary.
Long exact sequence of a sequence of inclusions
For , the inclusions and induce a short exact sequence of chain complexes
and hence a long exact sequence in homology
Remark
If and the inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, then it follows from homotopy invariance that is an isomorphism for all . Thus, the LES from the beginning of this section implies for all .
For a triple as in the previous theorem, this means that the connecting homomorphism is an isomorphism for all .