Overview
In these notes, we assume is a field of characteristic zero.
Abelian extension of a field
If is a finite extension of a field , then is an abelian extension if is a Galois extension (i.e., both normal and separable) and the Galois group is an abelian group.
Likewise, if is a nonconstant polynomial, then we say the Galois group of is abelian if the Galois group of its splitting field over is abelian.
Importantly, since every subgroup of an abelian group is a normal subgroup, it follows from (Theorem) Fundamental theorem of Galois theory that every subgroup of is normal, and hence every intermediate field such that is a Galois extension of (as well as itself an abelian extension). In particular, for all , the simple extension is normal, and hence the minimal polynomial splits into linear factors in ; in other words, once one root of has been adjoined to , all of its other roots are expressible in terms of .
The two main examples of abelian extensions are cyclotomic extensions—roughly, those obtained using roots of unity—and th root extensions—those for which the Galois group is isomorphic to a subgroup of (equivalently, have order dividing ).
Cyclotomic extensions
Proposition
Let be a splitting field of over and let denote the set of roots of in . Given a generator for the cyclic group , we have and is isomorphic to a subgroup of . In particular, is abelian.
Proof from Modern Algebra II. By the definition of a splitting field, factors into linear factors in . We first show that all of these factors are distinct: since has characteristic zero, the roots of are exactly . But is not a root of , so do not share a root and by the criteria in Formal derivatives on polynomial rings, does not have multiple roots. Thus, the set of th roots of unity is a subgroup of with order .
We also know that is a finite subgroup, hence cyclic by (Theorem) Existence of a primitive root. Then for any generator , we know that is a subfield of containing all the roots of . But by the definition of a splitting field again, is generated over but the roots of , so is the minimal such subfield and hence . This proves the first part of the claim.
Next, we show that if is a generator for , then is also a generator for all . Let , so is also a root of and hence for some . Then setting , we must have , and hence is a root of . But this implies that is also a root of , and since has order in , this means . Thus and is relatively prime to .
To identify with a subgroup of , define the map
where is an integer which we can take . The fact that means that is a well-defined element of . It is straightforward to check that is a homomorphism, i.e., that , using the fact that for all . Finally, is injective since
and thus is trivial. Thus, embeds as a subgroup, as claimed.
Primitive th root of unity
Let is a splitting field of and be the set of roots of in . A primitive th root of unity is a generator of .
Remark
- Since (Theorem) Existence of a primitive root implies that is cyclic of order , there are exactly generators of , where is the Euler totient function. Thus, there are exactly primitive th roots of unity.
- The cyclotomic polynomial therefore splits into linear factors, showing that .
- The proof above shows that permutes the primitive th roots of unity. In particular, the roots of are permuted by , so it follows from the definition of that
- Following the proof, since is identified with a subgroup of , by (Theorem) Lagrange we know that the order of will divide in general. However, we have
th root extensions
Proposition
Let and suppose has distinct roots in , i.e., that . Let and be a splitting field for . If is a root of in , then every root of is of the form for some , i.e., a root of . In this case,
and . Moreover, is abelian and isomorphic to a subgroup of .
In this situation, we have
Proof from Modern Algebra II. We first show that the splitting field is of the form , where is a root of in . Since , if root is a root of , then so is for all th roots of unity . Then there are at least distinct linear factors , and hence
divides in . However, since both sides are monic of degree , they must be exactly equal. This shows that splits into linear factors in , so must be a splitting field for and thus .
We now show the inclusion of into . Recall that the Galois group for the splitting field acts transitively on the roots of . Thus for any , the image is just another root of and hence for some uniquely specified (since assume nonzero). Then the map
sending each to the unique such that , is well-defined. We can check that is a homomorphism using the fact that for all , we have
since and hence is fixed. Finally, is injective since implies that
and we conclude that is isomorphic to a subgroup of .
Code snippets
(\mathbb Z/n \mathbb Z)^*